Home > Basics, Tutorials > Developing a measurement protocol, part 1

Developing a measurement protocol, part 1

By now, those of you who have been entering data from the literature — and maybe even more those who have been measuring bones themselves — will have noticed that it’s not quite as straightforward as it sounds.  Some bones are crushed, distorted, broken, reconstructed, lost in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters.  And what exactly is the “length” of a curved bone like the femur of many ornithopods?  And where exactly is the “midshaft” that’s measured for the midshaft diameter?  And so on.

We want to develop an explicit protocol for what bones are worth including, what measurements need taking and how they should be taken.  But to do that, we’ll need your help.  We want to know what issues you’ve come up against as you’ve worked on ODP data, so we can figure out standard answers.  Post your questions as comments to this article: we’ll discuss them in the comments, and when we feel we have consensus, we’ll start to assemble a protocol document.

Our general feeling is that yes, there will be minor errors and distortions in the data, but there is no reason to suspect systematic bias and therefore not much to worry about (and not much we can do about it). Hopefully the database that we’re putting together will live forever and in the future people will revisit these specimens and submit “cleaned up” measurements in cases where that’s warranted. But that doesn’t mean we can’t be doing useful stuff in the meantime. It also doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t acknowledge these problems and fix them wherever possible.

So: (a) yes, crushing, distortion, reconstruction, measurement conventions, etc. are all valid concerns; (b) we will strive to overcome them to the extent possible, both immediately for the first paper and ultimately for the evolving database; but (c) these problems plague any large quantitative study of morphology — the only difference with the ODP is that those problems are out in the open; and (d) we don’t anticipate systematic bias and don’t think these problems are serious enough to prevent us from doing useful work right now.

Right then: questions, please!

Brachiosaurus altithorax holotype FMNH P25107, last three presacral vertebrae in right lateral view.  Sorry, I can't break the habit.

Brachiosaurus altithorax holotype FMNH P25107, last three presacral vertebrae in right lateral view. Sorry, I can't break the habit.

About these ads
Categories: Basics, Tutorials
  1. September 17, 2009 at 1:33 am | #1

    My only concern is one that I feel must be cleared up. I mean, I request more information so I can contribute. I feel Andy Farke didn’t give me a clear explanation of this project. If you could please do so, that would be greatly appreciated. :P

  2. September 17, 2009 at 3:20 am | #2

    One other question (well, sensu lato): some museums give the whole dinosaur specimen a single catalog number while others give each bone element its own catalog number. This has generated some confusion while I am entering the column for specimen number.

  3. Andy Farke
    September 17, 2009 at 3:28 am | #3

    Send me a direct email (andrew.farke@gmail.com) and I’ll see what I can do to get you on the right track. As pointed out elsewhere, the FAQ’s and How-To Guide should explain most of the project.

  4. Andy Farke
    September 17, 2009 at 3:30 am | #4

    Hmm. . .good point. Maybe include a note listing all of the specimen numbers from a single individual? The only thing we’ll have to be careful of is where there are multiple size-similar individuals catalogued under the same or similar numbers. . .

  5. September 17, 2009 at 3:45 am | #5

    That is exactly the problem when I was verifying the Hunt et Lehman (2008) paper yesterday, Andy – did you read my e-mail sent to you last night? Thanks!

  6. Andy Farke
    September 17, 2009 at 5:49 am | #6

    Just replied to your email Leo! Re: the Hunt & Lehman paper, ReBecca Hunt herself will be providing some original measurements from the specimens, that will hopefully clear up any confusion.

  7. Andy Farke
    September 17, 2009 at 6:32 am | #7

    I would also add, for those who are curious, that this is laying the groundwork for writing the paper(s) resulting from the ODP. . .these are the sorts of questions we anticipate reviewers might ask!

  8. September 17, 2009 at 6:59 am | #8

    Thanks! Just wondering how many original authors are as kind as ReBecca… to confirm their data for us :)

  9. Henrique Niza
    September 18, 2009 at 5:57 pm | #9

    I have a question: what if the paper is regarding, not a specimen but, a dinosaur family. What specimen number should we mention regarding the limbs measurements referred on the paper?

  10. September 18, 2009 at 8:58 pm | #10

    Henrique, if the paper gives a specimen number, then we can use the measurements: just give the family name, or whatever the paper has, in place of the genus. But a paper that says “a labeosaurine tibia was 56 cm long” without giving a specimen number is, unfortunately, no use.

    Andy, if someone scours a paper for measurements but finds none, is it worth their letting you know? Then we could post that reference in a Don’t Bother page.

  11. Henrique Niza
    September 18, 2009 at 10:39 pm | #11

    I see… but what if the paper gives measurements of certain species but don’t specify the specimen number?

    And Mike Taylor’s idea sounds about great. I myself have a few checked papers with non-measurements.

  12. September 18, 2009 at 10:51 pm | #12

    I’d like to get Andy’s and Matt’s thoughts on this, too, but it seems to me that we’re not so hard up for data that we need to go scrabbling around with specimens whose number is not given, and which may therefore not even be accessioned.

  1. September 18, 2009 at 5:45 am | #1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: